Individual ambition serves the common good.

— Adam Smith

Who should AGI represent?

• Capitalists?
• Rulers?
• Union leaders?
• Artistic students who give speeches?
• The poor?
• The rich?
• The intelligent?
• The foolish?
• Utopian dreamers?

Clearly, AGI should not represent anyone's interests, because it should represent everyone's interests. However, a monopolized AGI cannot represent everyone’s interests. Only an open-source AGI, where everyone has access to AGI that represents their own position, can truly serve individual interests.

Although Nash equilibrium is not necessarily Pareto optimal (Adam Smith needs a revision), when AGI can bring the world closer to the basic assumptions of economics:

1. The Rational Agent Assumption
2. The Assumption of Information Symmetry

Then, Nash equilibrium will indeed become Pareto optimal. Individual ambition serves the common good.

Citations

[1]A Beautiful Mind - Bar Scene John Nash’s Equilibrium Game Theory [1080p english full scene], (Dec. 26, 2014). Accessed: May 09, 2023. [Online Video]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJS7Igvk6ZM